Sample report

Sunday evening check-in · Demo data · Alex & Jordan
This is a sample, not your data
Every session generates a report like this one, built from your own conversation.
Analyze your first session
Relationship health
Overall score from this session
62/100
Needs attention

Real care alongside real strain: both partners stay engaged, small moments of criticism escalate faster than they resolve, and the repair, when it comes, is genuine and effective.

AI-generated reflections on this conversation. Not medical or psychological advice, and not a substitute for a qualified professional.

Talk time
Alex: 52% · 148 wpm Jordan: 48% · 139 wpm
Alex
612Words
8Turns
2 minTalk time
148WPM
Jordan
566Words
8Turns
2 minTalk time
139WPM
Alex Jordan Peak tension 01:59 1 escalation See emotional dynamics →
What's working
  • Both partners stay engaged and keep trying to resolve the disagreement rather than withdrawing entirely.
  • Alex re-opens the conversation after it stalls, and names their own part in how it escalated.
  • Jordan asks a direct, specific question near the end, a genuine attempt to understand what Alex needs.
Worth watching
  • Alex's concerns tend to surface as generalized frustration ("the only one keeping track") rather than a specific request.
  • Jordan's first response is defensive, which shuts down the chance to hear what's underneath Alex's comment.
  • A brief withdrawal ("it's fine, do whatever you want") ends the exchange before it resolves.
Trajectory
Current phase
Active adjustment: working out a recurring division-of-labour friction point.
Growth potential
Good, with a small change in how the opening concern is framed.
How soon to seek support
Low: this is a common, workable pattern rather than a crisis.
Gottman four horsemen
Criticism, contempt, defensiveness, stonewalling
Criticism
Alex
Moderate

Frames the concern as "I'm the only one" rather than a specific request.

Jordan
Low
Contempt
Alex
Low
Jordan
Low
Defensiveness
Alex
Low
Jordan
Moderate

Counters ("I do plenty") rather than acknowledging the frustration.

Stonewalling
Alex
Low
Jordan
Moderate

"It's fine, do whatever you want" ends the exchange rather than continuing it.

Attachment styles
Alex
Anxious attachment
Seeks reassurance; reads silence as distance.
Jordan
Avoidant attachment
Needs space to process; retreats under pressure.
Conflict resolution styles

Alex: Raises issues directly but under emotional load, which can land as blanket criticism.

Jordan: Defends first, then re-engages once the initial defensiveness passes.

Compatibility: Workable with practice: Alex naming the specific need earlier, and Jordan pausing before defending, would shorten this cycle considerably.

Positive interactions

Positive and negative moments are roughly balanced, and the conversation ends clearly on the positive side after Alex's repair.

  • Jordan pivots from defensiveness to a genuine clarifying question.
  • Alex clarifies the ask isn't about keeping score.
  • Both agree on a concrete change and a point to check in.
Repair attempts

Frequency: One clear repair attempt, initiated by Alex after a pause.

Effectiveness: Effective: Jordan's question ("what do you actually need from me?") re-opens the conversation, and it resolves from there.

Deeper patterns
  • Criticism-then-defence opening, repair-question closing.
  • Household labour as the recurring flashpoint.
  • Both de-escalate reliably once a direct question is asked.

Alex's bids for shared responsibility are landing as blanket criticism, which triggers Jordan's defensiveness before the actual need is heard.

Compatibility factors: Both partners de-escalate when asked a direct question. That's a repeatable repair tool for this couple.

Where professional support could help
  • Practice naming specific requests instead of general frustration.
  • Practice a pause-before-defend response to perceived criticism.
Conversation weather
How each voice sounded across the session
Warm Calm Upset Heated
▲ Peak tension 01:59 ♥ Warmest 04:21
Alex
Jordan
Tension
00:00 02:23 04:45

Tone is an AI estimate from the voice recording — it can be wrong on individual lines. Treat it as a starting point for reflection, not a verdict.

At a glance
12s / 54sWarm / heated · Alex
27s / 34sWarm / heated · Jordan
1 · longest 1m 37sEscalations
1Repair attempts
01:59Peak tension
Said vs. sounded
Where the words and the voice seemed to point different ways
02:35 Jordan

“It's fine. Do whatever you want, I'm not going to argue about it.”

The words
Agreement, or at least a willingness to let the matter drop.
How it sounded
Flat and clipped, with none of the warmth of the earlier calm stretches.

This reads as withdrawal rather than agreement — the words close the subject while the voice says the hurt is still live. Taking "fine" at face value here would miss what Jordan actually meant.

Moments that mattered
01:10 Tone shift · Alex View in transcript ↓

“I just feel like I'm the only one keeping track of anything around here.”

The first hard edge in the conversation, and the point where the calm opening ends.

01:46 Conflict peak · Alex View in transcript ↓

“I'm not reading you a list! That's my whole point.”

The most intense moment of the recording by voice, not just by words.

02:35 Pulling away · Jordan View in transcript ↓

“It's fine. Do whatever you want.”

Ends the exchange without resolving it, and sets up the pause that follows.

03:10 Repair attempt · Alex View in transcript ↓

“Hey. I don't want to leave it like that.”

A deliberate repair after a break — the single most useful thing either partner does here.

03:25 Reaching out · Jordan View in transcript ↓

“What do you actually need from me, specifically?”

Turns the conversation from defending to understanding.

04:25 Warm moment · Jordan View in transcript ↓

“I do actually want to get this right.”

Closes the session on connection rather than on the agreement alone.

How conflict moves

Conflict here builds in one fast run rather than in repeated flare-ups: a criticism, a defence, and then about ninety seconds where both voices stay hard before either steps back. It ends because Alex deliberately re-opens it, not because it burns out on its own.

Heats up firstAlex Cools things downAlex
One pushes, one pulls back

Alex presses for a response; Jordan steps back.

Alex presses for a change and keeps restating the need; Jordan closes the exchange with "it's fine, do whatever you want" and leaves a longer gap before replying.

Signs of getting overwhelmed

Alex: Speech speeds up markedly during the heated stretch, and the strongest vocal intensity in the whole conversation lands there.

Tone balance
Share of each person's speaking time by tone
Alex 1m 44s speaking
12%
37%
17%
35%
Jordan 1m 43s speaking
26%
41%
33%
Does the pace change with the mood?
Words per minute, measured per emotional state
Alex
Baseline
169
Heated
177
Jordan
Baseline
166
Warm
164
Heated
168

Alex speaks 5% faster when heated than at their baseline.

Jordan speaks 1% slower when warm than at their baseline.

Jordan speaks 1% faster when heated than at their baseline.

Emotional dynamics
Emotional reciprocity
Emotional tone is mirrored with a lag: Jordan's guardedness softens a beat after Alex's frustration peaks.
Emotional safety
Moderate: both partners keep talking, but the middle of the conversation carries real risk of escalation.
Intimacy patterns
The repair and the closing exchange are bids for connection, not just conflict resolution.

Both of you speed up noticeably when the conversation heats up — Alex more than Jordan — which usually signals rising pressure rather than anger as such. The heated stretch runs for about a minute and a half in the middle, and everything after Alex's repair is calm or warm. There is no contempt anywhere in this recording, which matters more than the escalation does.

Alex's emotional regulation

Tends to let frustration build before raising it, which increases intensity when it does surface.

Triggers
  • Feeling solely responsible for household coordination
  • Being met with defensiveness
Jordan's emotional regulation

Manages discomfort by defending first and reflecting after.

Triggers
  • Feeling accused
  • Open-ended criticism without a specific ask
Transcript, with vocal tone
00:00 Alex Calm

So I wanted to talk about how the week went, because I think we keep having the same conversation on Sundays and then nothing really changes by Wednesday. I'd rather sort it out properly this time.

00:17 Jordan Calm

Yeah, that's fair. I've noticed it too. It always seems to come up when we're both tired, and then we drop it because neither of us wants a whole thing on a Sunday night.

00:32 Alex Calm

Right. So the part that's been sitting with me is the planning. Not the actual chores so much, more the remembering that they need doing at all, and when, and who's picking things up.

00:47 Jordan Calm

Okay, I think I hear that. Although I'd push back a little, because I do a fair amount of the remembering too. It's just maybe not the parts you notice from where you're standing.

01:10 Alex Heated

See, that's exactly it though. I just feel like I'm the only one keeping track of anything around here, and every time I bring it up it turns into a debate about whether it's even true instead of what we're actually going to do differently.

01:29 Jordan Heated

That's not fair, I do plenty, you just don't notice it. I'm not going to sit here and have a list read out to me like I've done nothing all week, when that is genuinely not what has been happening.

01:46 Alex Heated

I'm not reading you a list! That's my whole point. I don't want to be the person who has to read anyone a list, and the fact that you hear it that way is exactly the problem I'm trying to describe.

02:03 Jordan Heated

Well, it lands like a list. Every single time. And then I'm the one apologising for something I didn't know was a problem twenty minutes ago, which doesn't exactly make me want to jump in next time.

02:20 Alex Heated

I'm not trying to keep score. I genuinely am not. I just need some of this off my plate before I stop being able to do any of it well, and I don't know how else to say that.

02:35 Jordan Heated

It's fine. Do whatever you want, I'm not going to argue about it. We can just leave it and I'll figure out what I'm supposed to be doing on my own, it's not a big deal.

03:10 Alex Warm

Hey. I don't want to leave it like that. I'm not angry at you, I'm just tired, and I think I've been carrying it around all week instead of saying anything until it came out sideways tonight.

03:25 Jordan Calm

Okay. That helps, actually. What do you actually need from me, specifically? Because I think I've been guessing, and then getting defensive when the guess turns out to be wrong.

03:40 Alex Upset

Honestly? Just the mental part. If you owned the week's planning entirely — even badly, even differently to how I'd do it — that would take more off me than any amount of actual dishes would.

03:55 Jordan Warm

I can do that. I'd rather do that, honestly, than keep having this conversation. And I'd like you to tell me on Tuesday if it isn't working, rather than on Sunday when we're both already worn out.

04:10 Alex Warm

Deal. And I'll try to say it earlier, before it turns into a whole speech. I think I save it all up and then it arrives as an accusation, which isn't what I mean by it at all.

04:25 Jordan Warm

Alright. Tuesday, then. And for what it's worth, I do actually want to get this right, I'm not just agreeing to end the conversation. I like it better when we sort things out on the same night.

Conversation breakdowns
Specific exchanges, reframed
"I just feel like I'm the only one keeping track of anything around here." (Alex)
Pattern: A real need, expressed as a global complaint rather than a specific, actionable ask.
Try instead: "I'm feeling like I'm tracking most of the household stuff alone lately. Can we split the planning for this week?"
Why: Soften the startup: leading with a specific, current request lands as a request, not an attack.
"That's not fair, I do plenty, you just don't notice it." (Jordan)
Pattern: Defending contribution instead of first acknowledging the feeling behind the complaint.
Try instead: "That stings to hear. Can you tell me what's feeling heaviest right now?"
Why: Acknowledge before you defend: one validating sentence de-escalates faster than a counter-argument.
"It's fine. Do whatever you want, I'm not going to argue about it." (Jordan)
Pattern: Saying the opposite of what the voice is doing — the words end the conversation while the feeling stays wide open.
Try instead: "I'm too wound up to do this well right now. Can we come back to it in twenty minutes?"
Why: Say the feeling, not the code: naming a need for a pause is heard as care, while "it's fine" is heard as a door closing.
Alex's profile

Direct once engaged, but concerns build up silently before surfacing as frustration.

Strengths
  • Willing to clarify intent when asked
  • Doesn't withdraw from conflict
  • Initiates repair without being prompted
Challenge areas
  • Raising concerns before they build into frustration
  • Making requests specific rather than general
Daily practice
  • Name one specific need out loud within the day it comes up, before it accumulates.
How your voice lands

Your voice speeds up and sharpens well before your words get harsh — by the time you notice you're annoyed, Jordan has been hearing it for a while. If you catch yourself talking faster, that's the moment to slow down and name the feeling instead of pressing the point.

Jordan's profile

Protective of effort already made; needs a beat to move from defence to curiosity.

Strengths
  • Asks clarifying questions once past the initial defensiveness
  • Stays in the conversation rather than shutting down
  • Agrees to concrete, checkable changes
Challenge areas
  • Pausing before defending
  • Saying what you feel rather than "it's fine"
Daily practice
  • When something lands as criticism, ask one question before responding.
How your voice lands

When you say "it's fine" your voice goes flat rather than warm, and that gap is audible — Alex hears the flatness, not the agreement. Saying "I need a minute" out loud would land far more kindly than the version that sounds like the subject is closed.

Skill-building exercises
Soften the startup · 5 minutes, twice a week
Before raising a concern, rewrite it as "I feel ___ about ___, and I need ___", then practice saying the specific version out loud before the real conversation.
Structured check-in · 15 minutes weekly
Each partner gets uninterrupted time to name one thing that felt hard that week and one specific ask, before the other responds.
The twenty-minute break, agreed in advance · Agree once, then use as needed
Decide now what either of you will say when you need to stop — and agree that it means "I'm coming back", not "I'm done". Set the time you'll return before you separate.