AI Reflection Partner

Hear what's really being said.

One conversation is enough to start. APPRO reads the words and the tone underneath them, then names the pattern you keep circling back to.

  • Your audio is deleted once the report is built
  • Assessments grounded in Gottman research
STEP 1 OF 5 ~2 min to a report
Drop an audio file, or record here
m4a, mp3, wav · up to 60 minutes
sunday_evening_checkin.m4a
Create a free account to analyze this
Private to you. Never used for training.
Sound familiar?

Whatever you keep circling back to

Most recurring conflicts fall into a handful of shapes. APPRO listens for the pattern, whatever the subject is.

Money & spending Household labor Parenting decisions Time & attention In-laws & family Trust & jealousy Intimacy Communication styles Big life decisions
Inside a report

From conversation to clarity

Upload once. Here's every section of the report that comes back โ€” shown with one real Sunday-night conversation about the mental load of a household.

Drop an audio file, or record right here
sunday_evening_checkin.m4a
Transcript, with vocal tone
Sample excerpt
00:32AlexCalm

"The part that's sitting with me is the planning โ€” not the chores, the remembering that they need doing."

00:51JordanCalm

"I hear that. Though I'd push back a little โ€” I do a fair amount of the remembering too."

01:10AlexUpset

"See, that's exactly it. I feel like I'm the only one keeping track of anything around here."

01:29JordanHeated

"That's not fair. I'm not going to sit here and have a list read out like I've done nothing."

03:10AlexWarm

"Hey. I don't want to leave it like that. I'm just tired, and I've been carrying it around all week."

03:25JordanWarm

"That helps, actually. What do you actually need from me, specifically?"

Said vs. sounded · 01:29 โ€” the words are a flat refusal, but the tone underneath is hurt, not cold. APPRO flags where the two don't match.
Relationship health
Demo data
58/100
Needs attention

Real care alongside real strain: both partners stay engaged, but small moments of criticism escalate faster than they resolve.

What's working

  • Both stay in the room โ€” nobody walks out
  • A clear repair attempt at 03:10

Worth watching

  • Criticism escalates before it resolves
  • Alex is always the one to raise it
Alex: 58% talk time ยท 138 wpm Jordan: 42% talk time ยท 121 wpm
Patterns, named
Gottman Method
Criticism
High
e.g. "I'm the only one keeping track of anything" โ€” a global complaint, not a specific ask
Contempt
Low
Defensiveness
Moderate
Stonewalling
Moderate
Alex
Anxious attachment
Seeks reassurance; reads silence as distance.
Jordan
Avoidant attachment
Needs space to process; retreats under pressure.
The deeper loop: the argument is about the mental load โ€” but it keeps turning into an argument about whether the mental load is even real. That second argument is the one that stalls.
How the conversation moved
Emotional dynamics
Warm Calm Upset Heated
Alex
Jordan
Peak tension 01:29 First repair attempt 03:10 Escalation lasted ~2 min
A growth plan, made for this conversation
One line, reworked
"That's not fair, I do plenty, you just don't notice it." โ€” Jordan, 01:29
Pattern: a defensive counter-claim. It answers the accusation instead of the need sitting underneath it.
Try instead: "It lands like I've done nothing, and that stings. Which part is feeling heaviest for you right now?"
Why: naming the sting first lowers the temperature; the question moves you both back to the actual problem.
An exercise for this week
The 20-minute rule: when a Sunday conversation starts to heat up, either of you can call a 20-minute pause โ€” but you agree upfront to come back to it, not drop it.
This is a slice of one report.
The full report runs to four tabs โ€” transcript, health, patterns and emotional dynamics โ€” plus the complete growth plan. Read a real one, no signup.
Read a complete sample report
"

A perspective without a stake in the outcome

A good therapist is trained to be impartial, but they're still a person, forming a relationship with you over time, in one room, on their schedule. APPRO has no history with either of you and no session limit. It can be a private, consistent first read on your own patterns, any time you want one.

To be clear about what APPRO isn't: it's an AI reflection tool, not therapy, counselling, diagnosis or medical care, and it's no substitute for a qualified professional. If something in your relationship or your mental health needs real help, please go and get it.

Why APPRO

Built to notice what's easy to miss

Grounded in real relationship science

Assessments draw on the Gottman Method (the four horsemen, repair attempts, emotional reciprocity), not generic advice.

Hears tone, not just words

Vocal emotion detection surfaces what a plain transcript can't (frustration, warmth, withdrawal) as evidence in your report.

Private by design

Your recording is analyzed and then deleted. Reports are visible to you alone, never used to train on, never shared.